🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.